Updated version. Fretline markers. Alder body. 2 bi-pole pickups.
85 People rated this product : 9 out of 10
|
5 People wrote reviews |
Read all Fender Standard Jazz Fretless Electric Bass (Rosewood) reviews... |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 10 out of 10
|
Feature:
Of course, it's not active, so the sound is limited to the two jazz pickups. But if you're me, I prefer just the bridge pickup so it's all good. But some players might prefer a more variable sound. It's up to you. I wish these came stock with a Hipshot detuner so that I could drop to D (like Tony Franklin). Also, it would be nice if they offered a birdseye maple fretboard in the standard, along with no fret markers too.
Quality:
It's not no American series. The neck is pretty bowed and I'm not sure if that's natural (maybe so there's less fretbuzz?) or if the MIM version is really that bad. Everything else is great though. Coating is flawless, pickguard is extremely white, etc.
Value:
Great bass for a low price. It has the quality of a Fender product all for a good price. Definately a great bass for starting fretless playing.
Desirability:
Sex appeal is average. I got the brown sunburst and it looks great. I might add a tortoise shell pickguard instead because the white one doesn't look all that good (in my opinion). And besides the extremely white neck (which I hope will yellow with age), it's a good lookin' piece of wood.
Sound:
The sound is sweet (which you should expect with any fretless). Nice lows with the twangy highs. Harmonics are great on it. On higher notes, it sounds like an upright bass which is great for jazz (hence the name Jazz Bass).
Ease of Use:
It's easy to use if you have played bass for awhile. It's tougher to fret notes because you have to push down until contact with the fretboard (obviously). I hope players have caluses because I have played for 4 years and this thing tears 'em up still. The sliding is the only problem really.
Support:
I haven't had to call support yet. I received this bass as a gift for Christmas and have had no problems so far. Even if I do run into a problem, I'm sure Fender will help me with ease. The bass comes with a limited lifetime warranty for craftsmanship and materials I think, so that's definately a plus.
Overall:
I'm probably gonna stick with this bass until it breaks or I'm a millionaire. There's really no need to get another, unless you want an American or another brand. It sounds like Jaco's bass and looks like it too.
Submitted: 12/25/2007
Style of Music: Classic Rock, Jazz, Fusion, Alternative, Rock, Metal, etc
|
1 of 1 people (100%) found this review helpful. Did you?
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 7 out of 10
|
![]() |
zZounds has verified that this customer bought this product from us. |
Feature:
Standard J-Bass features. It would be nice if Fender would add the S-1 switch to this line as well, but I can't imagine that ever happening.
Quality:
Having owned a Mexican J-bass from about 6 years ago, the new models seem to be substantially improved in construction. It's a pretty solid instrument, and dare I say it feels a little lighter than the old one.
Value:
Like I said before. You get a lot more than you pay for where quality is concerned. The unit that I have was a NAMM demo, so I think Fender went a little farther in getting it nicely set up. Overall, It's quite sweet.
Desirability:
It's a Fender... I don't think anyone has ever said that Fender has sex appeal. If you want a sexy bass, get a Warwick. If you want a retro bass, get a Rickenbacker. If you want nuts and bolts, Fender is perfect.
Sound:
The sound is surprisingly good for a low-end Fender product. In the past, I've played a Warwick Proline Fretless, an American Standard J-Bass (Fretted), as well as a Rickenbacker 4003. This doesn't approach the Warwick in any way, but for the price, you get more than you pay for. This is a recording-only bass, and I play it through an SWR LA-10 amp. The combination of the two make for a very nice sound if you can get past the hum when your tone is turned all the way up.
Ease of Use:
Transitioning from my Warwick fretless to this one was a bit of a nuisance. The Warwick's neck dots are *at* the fretting position, whereas the Fender's neck dots are in the middle of it. So while you're trying to learn intonation positions, it's kinda hard to find the fret markers.
Support:
Never had to deal with Fender
Overall:
Overall, it's a great buy for the price, especially if you're starting out with Fretless. I started out in fretless on a $2700 bass, which in retrospect was probably overkill. The Fender standard would have served me just as well.
Submitted: 8/14/2006
Style of Music: Classic Rock / Punk / Alternative
|
1 of 1 people (100%) found this review helpful. Did you?
|
|
Read all Fender Standard Jazz Fretless Electric Bass (Rosewood) reviews...
30-Day 100% Satisfaction Guarantee Applies On This Item - Buy it, and if it isn't just right for you, return it!
"The website is so easy to use- both informational and professional. I found lots of product options (i.e. beginner's electric guitar)." - customer on November 27, 2008
Free Catalog |