Allen and Heath Xone 32 3-Channel DJ Mixer with LFO

Tap-programmable low-frequency oscillator.

Overall User Ratings

Overall:
* * * * * * * . . . 7 out of 10
Features:
* * * * * * . . . . 6 out of 10
Quality:
* * * * * * * * * . 9 out of 10
Value:
* * * * * * * . . . 7 out of 10
I Want It:
* * * * * * * . . . 7 out of 10
Sound:
* * * * * * * * * . 9 out of 10
Ease of Use:
* * * * * * * * * . 9 out of 10
Support:
* * * * * . . . . . 5 out of 10

back to product page
Write a Review:
 

Allen & Heath Xone 32 Customer Review

Overall:
* * * * * * * * * . 9 out of 10
Features:
* * * * * * * * . . 8 out of 10
Quality:
* * * * * * * . . . 7 out of 10
Value:
* * * * * * * . . . 7 out of 10
I Want It:
* * * * * * * * * . 9 out of 10
Sound:
* * * * * * * * * . 9 out of 10
Ease of Use:
* * * * * * * * * . 9 out of 10
Support:
* * * * * . . . . . 5 out of 10
 
 
 
Feature:
I guess two filters would be cooler, but only having one makes you work a little harder at it, and in the end you can do as much cool stuff as you need to. People are complaining about the cue l.e.d.s, but really at the end of the day the lights aren't just on and off, if you listen to the right part of both songs, say a strong kick, and thats the level you're trying to match, then you can do it, if you're just matching overall input voltage then for sure it won't match because one record will not be in the same condition as the next, so you listen and you watch the red led come on a little bit on the kick or a little bit somewhere else. The knobs at the back have suited me just fine, i've gotten used to it now and it's cool. These guys are right about the channel faders though, you're not buying this to scratch on the channel faders. Cutting sure, it's not super ideal but you can do it. I've already been through a few plastic faders knobs, they're more built for the shape of your finger and so fading in slowly is cool. The standard crossfader is also a bit of a stretch for say scratching, again you can do it and you can find worse, but that's not why you should use it.

Quality:
I've used two of them, mine and a my roomate also had one and on both of them the crossfader started leaking big time and needed replacing pretty early on its life.

Value:
It's a small mixer with big-boy insides, if you're not doing something where sound quality is a huge deal then you can get cheaper mixers with built-in effects for like half the price, but that filter sounds so nice filling up a big room.

Desirability:
It sounds sick and in a dark dj booth it looks sick, those blue filter lights...

Sound:
The sound quality is fine, big room, small room, recording or whatever it sounds good at any volume so you can hear all the crackles from your dirty records or the full bass and pristine highs from your clean ones.

Ease of Use:
It's pretty easy to use once you figure it all out, but there is enough to figure out with filters, eq, lfo etc that it will take you a few recordings to figure out the different things you like and then working it into your style and music genre.

Support:
No idea, never dealt with them.

Overall:
It's great, you're paying a lot as well and you don't feel like you're just paying for a name.

Did you find this review helpful?

Thank you. Your vote has been counted. Could you briefly tell us why the review was or was not helpful?
 
 
Thanks for your opinion!
 
 
 

"Beautiful sound, poor knob placement."

Overall:
* * * * * * * * . . 8 out of 10
Features:
* * * * * * * * . . 8 out of 10
Quality:
* * * * * * * * * * 10 out of 10
Value:
* * * * * * * * * * 10 out of 10
I Want It:
* * * * * * * * . . 8 out of 10
Sound:
* * * * * * * * * * 10 out of 10
Ease of Use:
* * * * * * * * * . 9 out of 10
Support:
* * * * * * * * * * 10 out of 10
 
 
 
Feature:
I was almost turned off of xone mixers completely by a review that stated that "4 leds were not enough". When a channel's cue is engaged on my xone 62, the large 12 segment "master" led changes to meter the cue level. This makes the precise gain adjustments a breeze. I would imagine that the 32 works the same, but don't hold me to it. I went with the 62 over the 32 for the extra inputs and because the gain knobs on the back of the 32 was the dumbest placement of any knob, on any mixer Ive ever seen IMO. Again the filters are amazing as well as the sound. The eqs could have been full kill as well.

Quality:
Built like a tank. Sound quality is top of the line.

Value:
You get what you pay for.

Desirability:
If it was not for the gains in back again I would have said 10. Also if I am wrong about the cue level showing up on the main leds as they do on the xone 62, then 4 led are not enough. Sound quality and filter functions put this mixer over the top, its just amazing how a poor placement of a knob could turn you away though.

Sound:
I own the xone 62 and have used the 32, the sound is beautiful! Filters are real nice and warm. Eq's do the job very nicely.

Ease of Use:
Gave a 9 instead of 10 because of the location of the channel gains on the back of the mixer. Besides that, everything is laid out nicely. Its not a starter mixer, but if you know how to use filters, eqs, and mix, then you wont spend more than 30 min figuring everything out.

Support:
the best until proven otherwise, and no problems them so far.

Overall:
Im sure you would want to eventually expand to more inputs and options in the future. If 3 inputs are good though, then the sound quality of the mixer alone would last you a lifetime.

Did you find this review helpful?

Thank you. Your vote has been counted. Could you briefly tell us why the review was or was not helpful?
 
 
Thanks for your opinion!
 
 
 

"Don't settle for less if you don't have to."

Overall:
* * * * * * * * * . 9 out of 10
Features:
* * * * * * * * . . 8 out of 10
Quality:
* * * * * * * * * * 10 out of 10
Value:
* * * * * * * * * . 9 out of 10
I Want It:
* * * * * * * * . . 8 out of 10
Sound:
* * * * * * * * * * 10 out of 10
Ease of Use:
* * * * * * * * * . 9 out of 10
 
 
 
Feature:
The featureset is very good for the price range, offering almost everything you need and very little you don't. I LOOOOOVE the filter. I have only two major (minor) beefs with the mixer. First, the EQs are not full kill - this may or may not be an issue for you, as I mix with the EQs killed and an open fader. The other issue is the channel level indicators. 4 lights is NOT enough. It'll put you in the ballpark, but it can't be relied on for good level matching - which can be an issue where you are recording sets in high-volume applications.

Quality:
Great

Value:
You can't find a better mixer for the price - it's shortcomings are more than made up for by it's clean sound and that oh-so flexible little filter on it.

Desirability:
It's a no nonsense peice. Nothing about it's looks or layout will grab you, but it is clean, uncluttered, and not unattractive. The Allen and Heath name has drawn it's fair share of praise, and it's certainly an amazing mixer for the price.

Sound:
Sound quality is, in a word, phenomenal. No complaints whatsoever. It doesn't seem to add or detract from the sound in any perceivable way.

Ease of Use:
Excellent.... the only somewhat confusing aspect is the gains on the rear of the unit. I would have switched the location of the gains and the auxiliary level controls.

1 of 2 people (50%) found this review helpful. Did you?

Thank you. Your vote has been counted. Could you briefly tell us why the review was or was not helpful?
 
 
Thanks for your opinion!
 
 
 

"Poor Monitoring"

Overall:
* . . . . . . . . . 1 out of 10
Features:
* . . . . . . . . . 1 out of 10
Quality:
* * * * * * * * * * 10 out of 10
Value:
* . . . . . . . . . 1 out of 10
I Want It:
* . . . . . . . . . 1 out of 10
Sound:
* * * * * * * * . . 8 out of 10
Support:
* . . . . . . . . . 1 out of 10
 
 
 
Feature:
great build and the filter is amazing. Bad points
Did you find this review helpful?

Thank you. Your vote has been counted. Could you briefly tell us why the review was or was not helpful?
 
 
Thanks for your opinion!